Following this adjustment, IgG concentrations were reduce among people living with HIV compared with those without HIV (percentage modify ?53%, 95% CI ?4 to ?76). Hospital, CA, USA). Samples from people living with HIV were day of collection-matched (same day time) and age-matched (5 years) to samples from randomly selected adults (aged 18 years or older) without HIV receiving care for chronic conditions at the same hospital. We compared seroprevalence by HIV status via mixed-effects logistic regression models, accounting for the matched structure of the data (random effects for Ursocholic acid the matched group), modifying for age, sex, race or ethnicity, and clinical factors (ie, history of cardiovascular or pulmonary disease, Ursocholic acid and type 2 diabetes). Severe COVID-19 was assessed in participants with past SARS-CoV-2 (IgG or PCR) illness by chart review and compared with multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression, modifying for age and sex. SARS-CoV-2 IgG, neutralising antibody titres, and antibody avidity were measured in serum of participants with earlier positive PCR checks and compared with multivariable mixed-effects models, adjusting for age, sex, and time since PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 illness. Findings 1138 samples from 955 people living with HIV and 1118 samples from 1062 people without HIV were tested. SARS-CoV-2 IgG seroprevalence was 37% (95% CI 24 to 50) among people with HIV compared with 74% (57 to 92) among people without HIV (modified odds percentage 050, 95% CI 030 to 083). Among 31 people with HIV and 70 people without HIV who experienced evidence of past illness, the odds of severe COVID-19 were 552 (95% CI 101 to 6448) instances higher among people living with HIV. Modifying for time since PCR-confirmed illness, SARS-CoV-2 IgG concentrations were lower (percentage switch ?53%, 95% CI ?4 to ?76), pseudovirus neutralising antibody titres were lower (?67%, ?25 to ?86), and avidity was similar (7%, ?73 to 87) among people living with HIV compared with those without HIV. Interpretation Although fewer infections were recognized by SARS-CoV-2 IgG screening among people living with HIV than among those without HIV, people with HIV had more cases of severe COVID-19. Among people living with HIV with past SARS-CoV-2 illness, lower IgG concentrations and pseudovirus neutralising antibody titres might reflect a diminished serological response to illness, and the related avidity could be driven by related time since illness. Funding US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, US National Institutes of Health. Introduction An understanding of whether susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 illness or propensity Ursocholic acid to develop severe disease is definitely increased in the population of people living with HIV is vital for both these individuals and their health-care companies.1 Although marginal housing can limit the ability of some people with HIV to shelter in place,2 studies so far possess found either Rabbit Polyclonal to Akt (phospho-Ser473) related3, 4, 5, 6 or lower7, 8 incidence of COVID-19 among people living with HIV compared with the general population, providing reassurance that HIV is unlikely to be a risk element for SARS-CoV-2 acquisition. People living with HIV might take higher extreme caution due to higher perceived susceptibility, as well as experience of the HIV epidemic, leading to less exposure to SARS-CoV-2.1 Conversely, persistent swelling or lower CD4-to-CD8 cell ratios among people living with HIV than among those without HIV could increase susceptibility to viral infection.9 Defining the precise incidence of COVID-19 among people living with HIV has been challenging, given limitations in population-based data. In light of the high proportion of asymptomatic infections with SARS-CoV-2, incidence estimates could be biased by differential screening rates among populations.1 Three of the largest population-based studies of COVID-19 incidence among people living with HIV (in Madrid [Spain], Barcelona [Spain], Wuhan [China], and New York State [USA]) showed related or lower COVID-19 incidence among people living with HIV compared with those without HIV, although these studies did not statement screening rates or test positivity.4, 6, 7,.